Evolution and Analysis of Brain-Body-Environment Systems

COGS Q700, Fall 2011


Lecture: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 1:00 - 2:15, 833 Eigenmann
Instructor: Randall D. Beer
Office: 840 Eigenmann
Phone: 856-0873
Email: rdbeer [AT] indiana [DOT] edu

Course Description
Notions of embodiment, situatedness and dynamics are becoming increasingly important in cognitive science, converging on a view in which an agent's behavior and cognition are seen not merely as products of its brain alone, but rather as arising from the interaction between the agent's nervous system, body and environment. In order to evaluate the significance of these ideas, this course will examine the construction and analysis of models of complete brain-body-environment systems, with a particular emphasis on the use of tools from complex systems (including evolutionary algorithms, dynamical systems theory and information theory) to study how such coupled systems work. Behaviors to be studied range from basic motor behavior and sensorimotor learning to categorical perception, selective attention, agency detection and communication.

Grading
1/3 Homework Assignments
1/3 Class Presentation
1/3 Final Project/Paper

Assignments
Assignment 1 (due 9/20/11)
Assignment 2 (due 10/13/11)
Assignment 3 (due 11/1/11)
Assignment 4 (due 11/29/11) - AgentData.zip

Syllabus
DateSpeakerTopicReadings
8/30BeerCourse Introduction 
9/1BeerEvolutionary AlgorithmsFogel, D.B. (1994). An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 5:3-14.
9/6 No Class - Spain 
9/8 No Class - Spain 
9/13BeerEvolutionary AlgorithmsHarvey, I.H., Di Paolo, E., Wood, R. and Quinn, M. (2005). Evolutionary robotics: A new scientific tool for studying cognition. Artificial Life 11:79-98.
9/15BeerDynamical Neural NetworksHopfield, J.J. (1984). Neurons with graded responses have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 81:3088-3092.
9/20BeerCTRNNs and Dynamical Systems TheoryBeer, R.D. (1995). On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior 3(4):471-511.
9/22BeerCTRNNs and Dynamical Systems TheoryBeer, R.D. (2006). Parameter space structure of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation 18:3009-3051.
9/27BeerEvolution of WalkingBeer, R.D. and Gallagher, J.C. (1992). Evolving dynamical neural networks for adaptive behavior. Adaptive Behavior 1(1):91-122.
9/29BeerDynamical Analysis of Evolved WalkersChiel, H.J., Beer, R.D. and Gallagher, J.C. (1999). Evolution and analysis of model CPGs for walking I. Dynamical modules. J. Computational Neuroscience 7:(2):99-118.

Beer, R.D., Chiel, H.J. and Gallagher, J.C. (1999). Evolution and analysis of model CPGs for walking II. General principles and individual variability. J. Computational Neuroscience 7(2):119-147.
10/4BeerDynamical Analysis of Evolved WalkersPsujek, S., Ames, J. and Beer, R.D. (2006). Connection and coordination: The interplay between architecture and dynamics in evolved model pattern generators. Neural Computation 18:729-747.
10/6BeerDynamical Analysis of Evolved WalkersBeer, R.D. (2010). Fitness space structure of a neuromechanical system. Adaptive Behavior 18:93-115.
10/11Santosh ManickaOther Sensorimotor ExamplesIzquierdo, E.J., and Buhrmann, T. (2008). Analysis of a dynamical recurrent neural network evolved for two qualitatively different tasks: Walking and chemotaxis. In S. Bullock et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 257-264). MIT Press.
10/13Richard BetzelOther Sensorimotor ExamplesIzquierdo, E.J. and Lockery S.R. (2010). Evolution and analysis of minimal neural circuits for klinotaxis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience 30:12908-12917.
10/18BeerEvolution and Analysis of LearningPhattanasri, P., Chiel, H.J. and Beer, R.D. (2007). The dynamics of associative learning in evolved model circuits. Adaptive Behavior 15(4):377-396.
10/20Alexander GatesOther Learning ExamplesIzquierdo, E., Harvey, I. and Beer, R.D. (2008). Associative learning on a continuum in evolved dynamical neural networks. Adaptive Behavior 16:361-384.
10/25Jonathan FrankelOther Learning ExamplesDi Paolo, E.A. (2003). Evolving spike-timing-dependent plasticity for single-trial learning in robots. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361:2299-2319.
10/27BeerEvolution of Minimally Cognitive BehaviorBeer, R.D. (1996). Toward the evolution of dynamical neural networks for minimally cognitive behavior. In P. Maes, M. Mataric, J. Meyer, J. Pollack and S. Wilson (Eds.), From animals to animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 421-429). MIT Press.

Slocum, A.C., Downey, D.C. and Beer, R.D. (2000). Further experiments in the evolution of minimally cognitive behavior: From perceiving affordances to selective attention. In J. Meyer, A. Berthoz, D. Floreano, H. Roitblat and S. Wilson (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 430-439). MIT Press.
11/1BeerDynamical Analysis of Minimally-Cognitive BehaviorBeer, R.D. (2003). The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior 11(4):209-243.
11/3BeerDynamical Analysis of Minimally-Cognitive BehaviorWilliams, P.L., Beer, R.D., and Gasser, M. (2008). An embodied dynamical approach to relational categorization. In B.C. Love, K. McRae and V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 223-228).
11/8BeerInformation TheoryCover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A. (2006). Elements of Information Theory (Chapter 2). Wiley.
11/10BeerInformation Theoretic Analysis of Minimally-Cognitive BehaviorWilliams, P.L. and Beer, R.D. (2010). Information dynamics of evolved agents. In S. Doncieux, B. Girard, A. Guillot, J. Hallam, J.-A. Meyer and J-B. Mouret (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 38-49). Springer.
11/15BeerInformation and Dynamics 
11/17Steven WilliamsOther Minimally-Cognitive Behavior ExamplesWard, R. and Ward, R. (2008). Selective attention and control of action: Comparative psychology of an artificial, evolved agent and people. J. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34:1165-1182.
11/22Eran AgmonOther Minimally-Cognitive Behavior ExamplesGigliotta, O., Pezzulo, G. and Nolfi, S. (2011). Evolution of a predictive internal model in an embodied and situated agent. Theory Biosci. DOI 10.1007/s12064-011-0128-x
11/24 No Class - Thanksgiving Break 
11/29BeerEvolution of CommunicationWilliams, P.L., Beer, R.D., and Gasser, M. (2008). Evolving referential communication in embodied dynamical agents. In S. Bullock, J. Noble, R. Watson and M.A. Bedau (Eds.), Artificial Life XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (pp. 702-709). MIT Press.
12/1Maxim BushmakinOther Communication ExamplesTuci, E. (2009). An investigation of the evolutionary origin of reciprocal communication using simulated autonomous agents. Biological Cybernetics 101:183-199.
12/6Scott McCaulayEvolution of Social BehaviorFroese, T. and Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Modeling social interaction as perceptual crossing: An investigation into the dynamics of the interaction process. Connection Science 22(1):43-68.
12/8BeerDiscussion